I meant to blog this shortly after I saw him, but got delayed on writing this piece. Dr. Greene has two books so far “The Explosive Child” and “Lost at School”. This post will focus on the latter of the two books which looks at why behavioural challenging students are failing in our system and how we are failing them. I am only going to give some of the key takeaways from the talk because I think that reading his book and thinking about changing your own mindset on this area could be beneficial to the students we all teach.
I had the honour of seeing a presentation about a month ago from Dr. Greene. It was insightful and was amazing to see the different ways that we could work with students to help them solve their problems. The first part of his talk was something that I have come to realize, but was great to hear again, “Children do well if they can”. All students want to do well and want to be successful, the students that have behaviour challenges just have other factors in the way and we (as teachers) need to help them out.
The main idea around the book and the talk was about how the students with challenging behaviours are challenging because they lack the skills to not be challenging. It is a simple idea and thought but is very powerful and is a different lens to look through in the life of a student. We used to think that it was the parent, or they were unmotivated, or attention seekers, or good manipulators, or even that they were testing limits…but these are wrong. Some of the comical counterexamples are that if they were good manipulators they would be doing it without us knowing, we all test limits and can’t blame any student for doing the same thing, and that we as adults seek attention all the time to get our way; so why are we getting mad at children for modelling what they see. These were all old world ideas and if the strategies we had to fix them worked, we wouldn’t still be having these problems today.
He outlined some of the big ideas of his book which revolved around the skills that behavioural challenging students lacked. They were executive skills (hindsight, forethought, impulse control), language processing and communication skills, emotional skills, cognitive skills (grey thinking), and social skills. The amazing part of this discussion was that he did not place any of the blame on the parenting techniques a student was exposed to (something most of us do) and didn’t look at any of the psychiatric diagnoses that we are all expecting from a topic like this. When he described some of the situations that displayed each one of the skills, it was easy to picture a student that I had taught or currently taught (in my short 3 year experience), which made talk that much more powerful.
I order to help these students he created a document to outline the different problems we see and strategies to help students and teacher collaboratively fix them. It is all collaborative because in that model there are winners and winners (no losers if everyone agrees on the strategies). You can find these resources at livesinthebalance.org and they are all free!
The strategy is the ALSUP (Assessment of Lagging Skills and Unsolved Problems). It’s a simple idea that can have a lot of impact on the lives of the children we teach. Teachers of the student meet and as soon as one person identifies a problem they see, all the teachers discuss where they may have seen a sign of this. This process is continued until the sheet is complete. The key things are that there are no theories here and they need to be specific to what has been seen. Once this is complete then the teachers decide which problem they will help the student solve and then the meetings with the student take place.
The reason for the meetings with students is because it helps them take ownership of the problem and shows that you have empathy as well. Its better than an adult imposed suggestion because the student may feel that the concern is not met and they are simply complying to make sure that they are fitting the rules of the class. The other alternative is to leave it aside and not work through the problem, which only leads to further concerns as the problem grows when left unsolved. There are some guidelines for the meetings but it can be overwhelming to see all the different parts of this model at once.
I know that it seems like some of the findings he presented are trivial and that it just creates another “job” to do, but I have been in a school where problems were brushed aside or solved from a unilateral perspective and it did not lead to anything but worse behaviour. I believe in the statement that children do well if they can and are given the opportunity to succeed. I have seen it in my applied level class this semester that if students are given the chance to be successful and feel the empathy from you, they will work their best to meet the expectations you set.
My question to you is, what do you think about this topic? How do we proactively deal with students who have behavioural concerns and how do we get them to fit back into our system effectively?